Would Ford’s  decision to forego repairing the defective design comply with   these ethical  guidelines? If so, why? If not, then what actions should Ford   have taken to  satisfy them?

Ford’s decision to forego repairing the defective design does not comply with ethical guidelines as it fails to take responsibility for its own mistakes. Ethically, companies should be held accountable for their actions and strive to make changes that benefit those affected by their decisions—in this case ensuring the safety of their customers by providing them with a reliable product.

Ford would have had to take immediate action to meet these standards, such as recalling any cars that contained faulty parts to minimise potential injury caused by accidents. Ford also needed to work quickly to resolve the repair problem. If they had done this, the customers would have felt more confident knowing that Ford was protecting them against any potential dangers associated with their use of said product.

In conclusion then it is important remember companies bear moral obligations towards stakeholders—particularly when comes issues involving public health/safety which must upheld regardless cost attached . Following ethical practices will demonstrate commitment to customer satisfaction, resulting in greater trust and long-term success for the organization.