What legal arguments could be raised by Sudson in support of the enforcement of the automatic renewal clause against Letisha? Explain.

Sign carefully

Sudson has several arguments that he can raise to enforce Letisha’s automatic renewal clause. First, Sudson must determine whether or not there was a legally binding contract. This would be a strong argument for them as it would prove that the parties were in agreement and fully understood the terms. Furthermore, they could argue that since Letisha failed to cancel her subscription before the expiration date according to the contract’s clause then she is liable for any additional fees incurred by automatically renewing her membership.

Additionally, they may also bring up other clauses within this document such as a “non-negotiable term” which states that certain aspects cannot be changed or amended even after signing. This provides further support for Sudson’s argument regarding enforcement of this particular clause. They could refer to applicable laws and regulations that protect business from losses due to non-compliance by customers with their contract agreements. This would provide them with additional protection in dealing with these cases.