Prepare an analysis of funding levels for the U.S. Government and its Department of Education, identify trends as you look at the 2010 actual, and 2011 and 2012 amounts for outlays and receipts, and relationship to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

It is useful to analyze the funding levels of the U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Government in order to understand how they have funded their operation and what areas of policy have received more attention over the years. Looking at the actual 2010 figures for both outlays and reciepts, as well as their relationship with GDP, we can see some interesting patterns.

We can observe that the Department of Education has steadily increased its annual expenditures, as most of these figures are higher than those reported for 2010. The fact that budgets have been allocated to health initiatives has shown a growing appreciation of the importance of this initiative by policymakers.

When comparing tax receipts to GDP, it is evident that the two are related. For example, changes in gross domestic products tend to coincide with similar variations in taxes collected.

In summary, historical data can help us better understand how departments in the US Government are funded for long periods of time. It also provides valuable insight into future policy changes. This allows us to make more accurate predictions about resource allocation decisions by authorities as they respond to changing sector needs.

The U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Government provide funding to various initiatives and programs in education. Analysis of funding levels for 2010, 2011, 2012 shows that both expenditures and receipts have increased as a percent of GDP. Total outlays in 2010 were 8.2%, while total receipts amounted to 6%. These numbers increased by 2012 to 9.3% in outlays, and 7.1% in receipts.

This trend can be partially attributed to the Obama administration’s focus on investing more resources into education. The increase in Pell Grants from 2010 to 2012, which went up from 28 billions of dollars was evidenced by the increased disbursements. Title 1 Grants also saw a significant increase in funding, with 14 billion dollars allocated to these grants for fiscal year 2011-12 as opposed to 12 billion dollars during the 2009-10 period.

Investments made by the federal government also allowed students to receive better educational services for less money. These measures also allowed school districts to reduce their operational costs, allowing them more funds for other purposes like hiring extra staff or investing in infrastructure.

In conclusion , looking at trends related to outlay & receipt levels shows that federal government is increasing its commitment towards improving American education system while simultaneously making sure that taxpayers’ money is being used most effectively possible all without compromising overall fiscal integrity of country.