Analyze the issue based on the following criteria:
- Identify the parties involved in the case dispute (who is the plaintiff and who is the defendant).
- Identify the facts associated with the case and fact patterns.
- Develop the appropriate legal issue(s) in question (i.e., the specific legal issue between the two parties).Provide a judgment on who should win the case – be clear.
- Support your decision with an appropriate rule of law.
- Be prepared to defend your decision and to objectively evaluate the other points of view.
In June 2001, Greenfeld, Stitely, and Karstetter negotiated to merge their practices into a partner-ship that would provide accounting, tax, and infor-mation technology services. The partnership was profitable every year from its inception. However, Stitely felt that Greenfeld’s information technol-ogy services were not generating as much revenue as his one- third share in the partnership should. So Stitely indicated to the partners that he wanted to withdraw from the partnership. Soon after, Stitely and Karstetter agreed to instead continue as part-ners together after Greenfeld was out of the picture. Greenfeld did not violate his partnership agreement, but the two partners forced Greenfeld out of the part-nership without compensating him for his interest. They accomplished this by unlawful means, such as purporting to withdraw from the partnership while in reality seizing control of its assets. Furthermore, they transferred the assets of the partnership to their new company, preventing Greenfeld from having computer access to the business files, software, and client records. Was the partnership terminated prop-erly? If the dissolution was wrongful, what poten-tial consequences could Stitely and Karstetter face? [ Wayne I. Greenfeld v. Frank L. Stitely, et al., 2007 Va. Cir. LEXIS 7 ( 2007).]
Order an Essay Now & Get These Homework Help Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
